Case Study: The Intent-Based Workflow
Consider a loan officer at a mid-sized mortgage company. Her name is Priya. On any given morning, Priya's job requires her to check in on a dozen active applications — each one spread across a different system.
Traditionally, her workflow looked like this:
Open the CRM to find the borrower's contact record and last touchpoint
Open the Loan Origination System to check underwriting status and missing documents
Open Gmail to find the borrower's latest message asking for an update
Open the internal compliance portal to verify any flag on the file
Manually compose a reply that stitches together everything she just read across four tabs
Five systems. One task. And Priya does this thirty times a day.
In the MCP-driven world, the entire path collapses into a single intent.
Priya types into her unified workspace:
"What's the status on Ravi Kumar's application and draft a reply to his message?"
Here's what happens behind the scenes — invisibly, in seconds:
An MCP server queries the CRM and returns Ravi's borrower profile and relationship history
A second MCP server hits the LOS and pulls the current pipeline stage, outstanding conditions, and estimated close date
A third MCP server scans the email thread and surfaces Ravi's latest message asking about his appraisal
A fourth MCP server checks the compliance portal for any active flags on the file
The LLM reasons over all of this in a single pass and generates one artifact in Priya's chat interface:
A two-paragraph status summary she can read in fifteen seconds
A fully drafted reply to Ravi — empathetic in tone, accurate on the details, with the appraisal timeline pulled directly from the LOS
A one-click send button that triggers the email through her mail MCP server and logs the outreach back into the CRM automatically
No tab switching. No copy-pasting. No risk of quoting the wrong close date because she was looking at last week's export.
This is exactly what SSO did for access — and MCP is now doing for action.
Before SSO, Priya would have needed a separate password for every one of those systems. The friction wasn't just inconvenient — it was a security risk and an onboarding nightmare. SSO didn't replace the systems. It removed the barrier between the user and the systems.
MCP does the same thing, one layer deeper. It doesn't replace Priya's CRM, her LOS, or her compliance portal. It removes the barrier between her intent and the data living inside all of them. The systems remain the source of truth. The LLM becomes the interface — generated fresh for every request, shaped to exactly what Priya needs at that moment, on whatever device she's holding.
On a desktop, that artifact is a rich panel with full context. On her phone between client meetings, it collapses to the two-line summary and a single tap to send. The interface adapts to the moment, not the other way around.
Overcoming the "Black Box" of Generative Interfaces
The most significant barrier to widespread adoption is trust. When a UI is generated by an LLM, it can feel like a "black box" where the user doesn't know where the data came from or how it was transformed. To solve this, 2026 interfaces have adopted "Explainable UI" patterns.
Every artifact now includes a provenance layer. When a user hovers over a number or a chart element, the system displays the specific MCP skill that fetched the data and the prompt logic that lead to that specific visualization. This transparency turns the "zero-UI" experience from a magic trick into a verifiable tool.
Furthermore, we are seeing the rise of "UI Sandboxing." Before an artifact is presented to the user, it is evaluated for security risks such as prompt injection or unauthorized data exfiltration. This ensures that even as we give LLMs more power to build interfaces, we are not opening new attack vectors in the enterprise.
The Long-Term Impact on SaaS Business Models
The shift to MCP and generative artifacts will likely disrupt seat-based pricing. If the value of a piece of software is no longer in its "destination" (the UI), but in its "connectivity" (the MCP server), SaaS companies will have to pivot toward consumption-based or value-based pricing.
We are moving away from software as a walled garden and toward software as a suite of interoperable capabilities. The winners of 2026 will be the companies that provide the best "agentic surface area"—the most usable, secure, and data-rich MCP servers that LLMs can build upon. The interface is no longer the moat; the protocol is.
We are moving away from software as a walled garden and toward software as a suite of interoperable capabilities. The winners in the long term will be the companies that provide the best "agentic surface area"—the most usable, secure, and data-rich MCP servers that LLMs can build upon. The interface is no longer the moat; the protocol is.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will traditional SaaS interfaces disappear?
No, they will likely survive as "Admin Consoles" for complex, deep-configuration tasks. However, for 90% of daily active work, users will move to consolidated hubs where generative UI layers provide exactly what is needed without the bloat of a full application.
Why does this matter for mobile devices?
Mobile is the ultimate driver for this change. Juggling separate apps for every task is too slow on a small screen. By pulling only the necessary "artifact" into a single feed, we finally achieve a mobile experience that is optimized for intent rather than navigation.
What makes MCP different from regular APIs?
While regular APIs require a developer to write specific code to connect System A to System B, MCP provides a standardized runtime where any LLM-based host can automatically discover and use any MCP-compliant tool. It acts as a universal adapter rather than a single-purpose bridge.
Can non-technical users really build their own artifacts?
Yes. In 2026, the barrier to "building" has shifted from syntax to logic. As long as a user can describe the business logic and the desired outcome, the LLM can generate the functional artifact using standard web technologies (like React or Tailwind) and wire it to live data via MCP.
Will traditional SaaS interfaces disappear completely?
Not entirely, but their role will change. Traditional UIs will become "fallback" or "admin" interfaces for complex, low-frequency configuration. For the vast majority of day-to-day work, users will interact through dynamic generative UI layers that exist only for the duration of a task.
Discussion