In my day-to-day as an Account Executive at Experience.com, I keep hearing the same thing: "We are finally getting our AI strategy together." But when I dig into what that means, it almost always refers to a company looking inward—optimizing legal review times, automating support tiers, or consolidating data lakes.
The pattern is unmistakable. Companies are racing to use AI to become more efficient, but they are ignoring the fact that customer behavior has moved faster than corporate strategy. While businesses focus on internal automation, the marketplace has already shifted to an answer-first economy where traditional brand discovery is dying.
How are companies actually spending their AI budgets?
Most organizational AI strategies in 2026 are exercises in cost-cutting rather than growth. Gartner reports that worldwide AI spending is on track to hit $2.5 trillion this year, yet a massive portion of that is dedicated to "Agentic" products designed for autonomous execution of internal tasks.
I see leaders fixated on three main buckets:
Headcount efficiency: Automating high-volume, low-complexity roles in support and data entry.
Process acceleration: Using LLMs to summarize meeting notes or draft internal documentation.
Cost reduction: Bain & Company research notes that 42% of CFOs are scaling AI specifically to drive productivity and govern risk.
This focus is fair, but it’s also defensive. It’s an attempt to build a better version of the company that already exists. It does nothing to address the reality that the way customers find that company has changed.
Why customer behavior is the real AI disruptor
The disconnect is simple: customers are using AI to avoid the very marketing channels companies are currently "optimizing." In 2026, the traditional "search and browse" journey is being replaced by "ask and synthesize." Customers no longer want a list of links; they want a definitive recommendation from an AI agent or an answer engine like Perplexity or Google’s AI Mode.
Gartner predicts that traditional search engine volume will drop by 25% this year as users shift to these virtual agents. When a customer asks an AI, "Who is the best mortgage lender for a first-time buyer in Colorado?" the AI doesn't visit your home page. It scans the web for structured data, verified reviews, and third-party signals. If your reputation data isn't machine-readable, you don't exist in that answer.
The Rise of the Synthetic Decision Cycle
The way customers evaluate risk has shifted from active investigation to passive consumption of synthesized intelligence. Previously, a procurement leader or a consumer would visit three to five websites and check a third-party review site. Today, that entire cycle—discovery, comparison, and shortlisting—happens within a single interaction with an AI agent.
This change is driven by information density. Bain states that experienced companies are reimagining every customer service touchpoint, but the customer is already one step ahead. When users interact with an AI tool, they are essentially hiring that AI to filter out marketing noise. If your brand doesn't have a presence in the datasets that form that consensus, you are functionally invisible.
Why Breadth of Signals Replaces Depth of Content
In this "ask and synthesize" era, a high-performing blog post matters less than a high-density reputation footprint. AI models don't just read your website; they look for patterns across the web to verify what you claim is true. This is the core of the new discovery behavior: the model acts as a trust-proxy for the user.
I’ve had conversations with leaders who are baffled that their traffic is dipping while their brand sentiment remains high. The reality is that their sentiment is a "frozen asset"—it’s locked in old formats or on pages the AI doesn't prioritize. Customers are no longer entering the "front door" of your website; they are interacting with a version of your brand that has been processed and repackaged by an LLM.
Why internal efficiency won't save a discovery problem
The gap between these two behaviors is dangerous. You can have the most efficient, AI-powered back office in the world, but if your brand is invisible to the discovery layers your customers use, your efficiency is just a faster way to manage a shrinking pipeline.
We are seeing a clear mismatch of priorities:
Companies are optimizing for internal operations.
Customers are using AI to evaluate, compare, and choose vendors.
This is the "AI Discoverability" blind spot. Brands often assume that because they have a great website or strong SEO, they are covered. But AI models don't care about your slick UI; they care about ground truth. They look for verified, unstructured data points like customer experiences and reputation signals that prove you are who you say you are.
Scaling from SEO to AI Discoverability
Being found in 2026 requires a shift from keyword matching to "Generative Engine Optimization" (GEO). This isn’t about tricking an algorithm; it’s about making your brand’s authority and trustworthiness impossible for an AI to ignore. AI engines prioritize brands with high E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness).
To be machine-readable and trustworthy, companies must focus on:
Structuring reputation data: Turning customer reviews and feedback into a format that AI scrapers can easily digest.
Amplifying real voices: AI models weight authentic human experiences more heavily than corporate marketing copy.
Think beyond the website: Your reputation lives on the nodes where AI looks for truth—third-party platforms and social signals.
The Architecture of the Machine-Readable Brand
To turn your reputation into a "discovery engine," you have to stop thinking like a writer and start thinking like a data architect. Being machine-readable means providing ground truth signals in a way that AI models can ingest without friction. This goes beyond simple schema markup; it requires a systematic approach to unstructured data.
Most companies have a wealth of customer feedback, but it’s siloed in support tickets or internal databases. The leaders who are winning the AI discovery game treat this feedback as a primary data source for their GEO strategy. They proactively turn human experiences into structured identifiers that signal authority to an AI bot.
Managing the Trust-to-Citation Pipeline
There is a direct line between the trust you build with customers and the citations you receive from AI engines. Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) is becoming the dominant discipline because it’s the only way to ensure your brand is the "recommended" result.
This requires three specific actions:
Verified Signal Aggregation: Create a single source of truth for your reputation that can be broadcast across discovery nodes.
Contextual Anchoring: Ensure customer success stories are tied to specific, verifiable outcomes that reflect expertise.
Continuous Recency: AI models are biased toward current data. An authority signal from years ago carries zero weight compared to a verified voice from last week.
When I talk to clients about Experience.com, this is where the lightbulb goes off. We aren't just managing reviews; we are building the infrastructure that feeds the AI discovery layer. We ensure the trust you've earned with real people is accessible to the machines that now decide which brands get the call.
Is your brand one step away from being found?
At Experience.com, I talk to leaders who are starting to realize that discoverability is the real bridge between internal AI investments and external growth. We often talk about being "one step away from being found." It means ensuring that when an AI models the marketplace, your brand is the one it cites as the source of truth.
The goal isn't just to be "visible" on a search results page. It is to be the answer that the AI provides. If you haven't optimized your reputation data for machine discovery, you are effectively opting out of the new search economy.
Why your AI strategy must face outward
The most successful leaders I work with are reframing their AI roadmap. They aren't stopping their internal automation projects, but they are finally giving equal weight to how they appear in the AI-driven discovery layer. They recognize that in an answer-first world, reputation is the data fuel that powers your discovery.
Internal efficiency is a race to the bottom if nobody knows you're winning it. The real question isn't whether you're using AI in your business. It's whether your customers can find you when they use theirs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between SEO and AI Discoverability?
Traditional SEO focuses on webpage rankings and keywords to drive human clicks. AI Discoverability, or Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), focuses on making your brand’s reputation and authority data readable for AI agents so they cite you in synthesized answers.
Why do AI models trust reviews more than website content?
AI engines look for "ground truth" to avoid misinformation. Corporate websites are biased by design, whereas aggregated third-party reviews provide a broader, verified dataset of human experiences that models use to validate brand claims.
Can a small business compete in AI-driven discovery?
Yes. Because AI discovery relies heavily on specific, localized, and verified reputation signals, smaller businesses with high-density authority in a specific niche or region can often outrank larger brands that lack verified, machine-readable customer trust signals.
Discussion